Skip to content
quranbench
Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1Quran 3:67:9

حَنِيفًا

Forms

Computed · derived from the Uthmani text
Uthmani (as written)
حَنِيفًا Quranic text
Simple
حَنِيفًا
Without tashkeel
حنيفا
Normalised (searchable)
حنيفا

Position

Computed
Verse
3:67
Word in verse
9
Token id
quran:tanzil-uthmani:3:67:9

Morphology

Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)
Gloss
a true
Transliteration
ḥanīfan
Lemma
حَنِيف
Part of speech
Noun (N)
Features
case: ACCstate: indefinitegender: M

Sub-word segments

  1. حَنِيفًاstem · N · ح ن ف

Morphology is an external annotation from the Leeds Quranic Arabic Corpus, licensed GPL-2.0-or-later. It is not Quranic text and never alters the token.

In context

Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1

How translators rendered it

Translation · 4 editions

These translations render verse 3:67 — the whole verse this word appears in — not this word alone. The correspondence is verse-level: no word-level alignment of translations exists for these editions, so we do not claim which English word renders this Arabic word. Compare the editions →

Abraham was neither a Jew nor a Christian, but he was a Monotheist, a Muslim. And he was not of the Polytheists
Translation · Talal Itani (2012)CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Abraham was not a Jew, nor yet a Christian; but he was an upright man who had surrendered (to Allah), and he was not of the idolaters
Translation · Marmaduke Pickthall (1930)Public Domain
Abraham was neither Jew nor Christian; but he was sound in the faith, a Muslim; and not of those who add gods to God
Translation · John Medows Rodwell (1861)Public Domain
Abraham was not a Jew, nor yet a Christian, but he was a `Hanif resigned, and not of the idolaters
Translation · Edward Henry Palmer (1880)Public Domain

Same form · 10 occurrences

Computed

This exact written form حَنِيفًا appears 10 times in the corpus.

Root ح ن ف · 12 occurrences

Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)

The root ح ن ف occurs 12 times across 2 distinct forms.

See the full root page for ح ن ف

Cited by 0 investigations

Community

No published investigation cites this word yet. When one does, it appears here — the evidence links back to the argument.