Skip to content
quranbench
Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1Quran 7:90:6

قَوْمِهِۦ

Forms

Computed · derived from the Uthmani text
Uthmani (as written)
قَوْمِهِۦ Quranic text
Simple
قَوْمِهِ
Without tashkeel
قومه
Normalised (searchable)
قومه

Position

Computed
Verse
7:90
Word in verse
6
Token id
quran:tanzil-uthmani:7:90:6

Morphology

Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)
Transliteration
qawmihi
Lemma
قَوْم
Part of speech
Noun (N)
Features
case: GENgender: M

Sub-word segments

  1. قَوْمِstem · N · ق و م
  2. هِۦsuffix · PRON

Morphology is an external annotation from the Leeds Quranic Arabic Corpus, licensed GPL-2.0-or-later. It is not Quranic text and never alters the token.

In context

Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1

How translators rendered it

Translation · 4 editions

These translations render verse 7:90 — the whole verse this word appears in — not this word alone. The correspondence is verse-level: no word-level alignment of translations exists for these editions, so we do not claim which English word renders this Arabic word. Compare the editions →

The elite of his people who disbelieved said, “If you follow Shuaib, you will be losers.”
Translation · Talal Itani (2012)CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
But the chieftains of his people, who were disbelieving, said: If ye follow Shu'eyb, then truly ye shall be the losers
Translation · Marmaduke Pickthall (1930)Public Domain
And the chiefs of his people who believed not, said, "If ye follow Shoaib, ye shall then surely perish
Translation · John Medows Rodwell (1861)Public Domain
And the chiefs of those who disbelieved amongst his people said, 'If ye follow Shohaib, verily, ye shall be the losers
Translation · Edward Henry Palmer (1880)Public Domain

Same form · 18 occurrences

Computed

This exact written form قَوْمِهِۦ appears 18 times in the corpus.

View all 18 occurrences in search →

Root ق و م · 660 occurrences

Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)

The root ق و م occurs 660 times across 155 distinct forms.

See the full root page for ق و م

Cited by 0 investigations

Community

No published investigation cites this word yet. When one does, it appears here — the evidence links back to the argument.