The Poets 26:102Quranic text
فَلَوْأَنَّلَنَاكَرَّةًفَنَكُونَمِنَٱلْمُؤْمِنِينَ
Reference 26:102Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1Quran 26:102:5
فَنَكُونَ
Forms
Computed · derived from the Uthmani text- Uthmani (as written)
- فَنَكُونَ Quranic text
- Simple
- فَنَكُونَ
- Without tashkeel
- فنكون
- Normalised (searchable)
- فنكون
Position
Computed- Surah
- 26 · The Poets
- Verse
- 26:102
- Word in verse
- 5
- Token id
quran:tanzil-uthmani:26:102:5
Morphology
Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)- Gloss
- then we could be
- Transliteration
- fanakūna
- Root
- ك و نk-w-n
- Lemma
- كانَ
- Part of speech
- Verb (V)
- Features
- tense: IMPFmood: SUBJperson: 1number: pluralverb_form: 1family: كَان
Sub-word segments
- فَprefix · CAUS
- نَكُونَstem · V · ك و ن
Morphology is an external annotation from the Leeds Quranic Arabic Corpus, licensed GPL-2.0-or-later. It is not Quranic text and never alters the token.
In context
Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1How translators rendered it
Translation · 4 editionsThese translations render verse 26:102 — the whole verse this word appears in — not this word alone. The correspondence is verse-level: no word-level alignment of translations exists for these editions, so we do not claim which English word renders this Arabic word. Compare the editions →
If only we could have another chance, we would be among the faithful.”Oh, that we had another turn (on earth), that we might be of the believersCould we but return, we would be of the believersbut had we a turn we would be of the believersSame form · 1 occurrence
ComputedThis exact form appears only here — it is a hapax in the corpus.
Root ك و ن · 1390 occurrences
Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)The root ك و ن occurs 1390 times across 121 distinct forms.
- كَانُوا۟2:10:11
- كَانُوا۟2:16:10
- كُنتُمْ2:23:2
- كُنتُمْ2:23:19
- وَكُنتُمْ2:28:4
- كُنتُمْ2:31:14
- كُنتُمْ2:33:21
- وَكَانَ2:34:11
- فَتَكُونَا2:35:16
- كَانَا2:36:6
- تَكُونُوٓا۟2:41:8
- كَانُوٓا۟2:57:16
Cited by 0 investigations
CommunityNo published investigation cites this word yet. When one does, it appears here — the evidence links back to the argument.