وَيَقُولُونَأَئِنَّالَتَارِكُوٓا۟ءَالِهَتِنَالِشَاعِرٍمَّجْنُونٍۭ
Reference 37:36Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1Quran 37:36:5
لِشَاعِرٍ
Forms
Computed · derived from the Uthmani text- Uthmani (as written)
- لِشَاعِرٍ Quranic text
- Simple
- لِشَاعِرٍ
- Without tashkeel
- لشاعر
- Normalised (searchable)
- لشاعر
Position
Computed- Verse
- 37:36
- Word in verse
- 5
- Token id
quran:tanzil-uthmani:37:36:5
Morphology
Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)- Gloss
- for a poet
- Transliteration
- lishāʿirin
- Root
- ش ع رsh-aa-r
- Lemma
- شاعِر
- Part of speech
- Noun (N)
- Features
- case: GENstate: indefinitegender: Mnumber: singular
Sub-word segments
- لِprefix · P
- شَاعِرٍstem · N · ش ع ر
Morphology is an external annotation from the Leeds Quranic Arabic Corpus, licensed GPL-2.0-or-later. It is not Quranic text and never alters the token.
In context
Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1Those drawn up in Ranks 37:36Quranic text
How translators rendered it
Translation · 4 editionsThese translations render verse 37:36 — the whole verse this word appears in — not this word alone. The correspondence is verse-level: no word-level alignment of translations exists for these editions, so we do not claim which English word renders this Arabic word. Compare the editions →
And said, “Are we to abandon our gods for a mad poet?”And said: Shall we forsake our gods for a mad poetAnd said, "Shall we then abandon our gods for a crazed poetand say, 'What! shall we leave our gods for an infatuated poetSame form · 1 occurrence
ComputedThis exact form appears only here — it is a hapax in the corpus.
Root ش ع ر · 40 occurrences
Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)The root ش ع ر occurs 40 times across 15 distinct forms.
- يَشْعُرُونَ2:9:10
- يَشْعُرُونَ2:12:7
- تَشْعُرُونَ2:154:13
- شَعَآئِرِ2:158:5
- ٱلْمَشْعَرِ2:198:16
- يَشْعُرُونَ3:69:13
- شَعَٰٓئِرَ5:2:6
- يَشْعُرُونَ6:26:11
- يُشْعِرُكُمْ6:109:16
- يَشْعُرُونَ6:123:15
- يَشْعُرُونَ7:95:18
- يَشْعُرُونَ12:15:17
Cited by 0 investigations
CommunityNo published investigation cites this word yet. When one does, it appears here — the evidence links back to the argument.