Skip to content
quranbench
Search
Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1Quran 30:32:11

فَرِحُونَ

Forms

Computed · derived from the Uthmani text
Uthmani (as written)
فَرِحُونَ Quranic text
Simple
فَرِحُونَ
Without tashkeel
فرحون
Normalised (searchable)
فرحون

Position

Computed
Surah
30 · The Romans
Verse
30:32
Word in verse
11
Token id
quran:tanzil-uthmani:30:32:11

Morphology

Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)
Gloss
rejoicing.
Transliteration
fariḥūna
Root
ف ر حf-r-hh
Lemma
فَرِح
Part of speech
Noun (N)
Features
case: NOMgender: Mnumber: plural

Sub-word segments

  1. فَرِحُونَstem · N · ف ر ح

Morphology is an external annotation from the Leeds Quranic Arabic Corpus, licensed GPL-2.0-or-later. It is not Quranic text and never alters the token.

In context

Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1

How translators rendered it

Translation · 4 editions

These translations render verse 30:32 — the whole verse this word appears in — not this word alone. The correspondence is verse-level: no word-level alignment of translations exists for these editions, so we do not claim which English word renders this Arabic word. Compare the editions →

Of those who divided their religion, and became sects; each faction pleased with what they have
Translation · Talal Itani (2012)CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Of those who split up their religion and became schismatics, each sect exulting in its tenets
Translation · Marmaduke Pickthall (1930)Public Domain
Of those who have split up their religion, and have become sects, where every party rejoices in what is their own
Translation · John Medows Rodwell (1861)Public Domain
Of those who have divided their religion and become sects, every party in what they have, rejoice
Translation · Edward Henry Palmer (1880)Public Domain

Same form · 3 occurrences

Computed

This exact written form فَرِحُونَ appears 3 times in the corpus.

Root ف ر ح · 22 occurrences

Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)

The root ف ر ح occurs 22 times across 14 distinct forms.

See the full root page for ف ر ح →

Cited by 0 investigations

Community

No published investigation cites this word yet. When one does, it appears here — the evidence links back to the argument.