Skip to content
quranbench
Search
Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1Quran 26:205:3

مَّتَّعْنَٰهُمْ

Forms

Computed · derived from the Uthmani text
Uthmani (as written)
مَّتَّعْنَٰهُمْ Quranic text
Simple
مَّتَّعْنَٰهُمْ
Without tashkeel
متعنهم
Normalised (searchable)
متعنهم

Position

Computed
Surah
26 · The Poets
Verse
26:205
Word in verse
3
Token id
quran:tanzil-uthmani:26:205:3

Morphology

Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)
Gloss
We let them enjoy
Transliteration
mattaʿnāhum
Root
م ت عm-t-aa
Lemma
مَتَّعْ
Part of speech
Verb (V)
Features
tense: PERFperson: 1number: pluralverb_form: 2

Sub-word segments

  1. مَّتَّعْstem · V · م ت ع
  2. نَٰsuffix · PRON
  3. هُمْsuffix · PRON

Morphology is an external annotation from the Leeds Quranic Arabic Corpus, licensed GPL-2.0-or-later. It is not Quranic text and never alters the token.

In context

Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1

How translators rendered it

Translation · 4 editions

These translations render verse 26:205 — the whole verse this word appears in — not this word alone. The correspondence is verse-level: no word-level alignment of translations exists for these editions, so we do not claim which English word renders this Arabic word. Compare the editions →

Have you considered: if We let them enjoy themselves for some years
Translation · Talal Itani (2012)CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Hast thou then seen, if We content them for (long) years
Translation · Marmaduke Pickthall (1930)Public Domain
How thinkest thou? If after we have given them their fill for years
Translation · John Medows Rodwell (1861)Public Domain
What thinkest thou? if we let them enjoy themselves for years
Translation · Edward Henry Palmer (1880)Public Domain

Same form · 1 occurrence

Computed

This exact form appears only here — it is a hapax in the corpus.

Root م ت ع · 70 occurrences

Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)

The root م ت ع occurs 70 times across 45 distinct forms.

See the full root page for م ت ع →

Cited by 0 investigations

Community

No published investigation cites this word yet. When one does, it appears here — the evidence links back to the argument.