The Prophets 21:54Quranic text
قَالَلَقَدْكُنتُمْأَنتُمْوَءَابَآؤُكُمْفِىضَلَٰلٍمُّبِينٍ
Reference 21:54Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1Quran 21:54:5
وَءَابَآؤُكُمْ
Forms
Computed · derived from the Uthmani text- Uthmani (as written)
- وَءَابَآؤُكُمْ Quranic text
- Simple
- وَءَابَآؤُكُمْ
- Without tashkeel
- وءاباؤكم
- Normalised (searchable)
- وءاباؤكم
Position
Computed- Surah
- 21 · The Prophets
- Verse
- 21:54
- Word in verse
- 5
- Token id
quran:tanzil-uthmani:21:54:5
Morphology
Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)- Gloss
- and your forefathers
- Transliteration
- waābāukum
- Root
- أ ب وe-b-w
- Lemma
- آباء
- Part of speech
- Noun (N)
- Features
- case: NOMgender: Mnumber: plural
Sub-word segments
- وَprefix · CONJ
- ءَابَآؤُstem · N · أ ب و
- كُمْsuffix · PRON
Morphology is an external annotation from the Leeds Quranic Arabic Corpus, licensed GPL-2.0-or-later. It is not Quranic text and never alters the token.
In context
Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1How translators rendered it
Translation · 4 editionsThese translations render verse 21:54 — the whole verse this word appears in — not this word alone. The correspondence is verse-level: no word-level alignment of translations exists for these editions, so we do not claim which English word renders this Arabic word. Compare the editions →
He said, “You and your parents are in evident error.”He said: Verily ye and your fathers were in plain errorHe said, "Truly ye and your fathers have been in a plain mistakeSaid he, 'Both you and your fathers have been in obvious errorSame form · 1 occurrence
ComputedThis exact form appears only here — it is a hapax in the corpus.
Root أ ب و · 117 occurrences
Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)The root أ ب و occurs 117 times across 55 distinct forms.
- ءَابَآئِكَ2:133:19
- ءَابَآءَنَآ2:170:14
- ءَابَآؤُهُمْ2:170:17
- ءَابَآءَكُمْ2:200:7
- وَلِأَبَوَيْهِ4:11:23
- أَبَوَاهُ4:11:40
- ءَابَآؤُكُمْ4:11:56
- ءَابَآؤُكُم4:22:5
- ءَابَآءَنَآ5:104:16
- ءَابَآؤُهُمْ5:104:19
- لِأَبِيهِ6:74:4
- ءَابَآئِهِمْ6:87:2
Cited by 0 investigations
CommunityNo published investigation cites this word yet. When one does, it appears here — the evidence links back to the argument.