Skip to content
quranbench
Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1Quran 21:11:6

ظَالِمَةً

Forms

Computed · derived from the Uthmani text
Uthmani (as written)
ظَالِمَةً Quranic text
Simple
ظَالِمَةً
Without tashkeel
ظالمة
Normalised (searchable)
ظالمه

Position

Computed
Verse
21:11
Word in verse
6
Token id
quran:tanzil-uthmani:21:11:6

Morphology

Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)
Gloss
unjust,
Transliteration
ẓālimatan
Lemma
ظالِمَة
Part of speech
Noun (N)
Features
case: ACCstate: indefinitegender: Fderivation: ACT_PCPLverb_form: 1

Sub-word segments

  1. ظَالِمَةًstem · N · ظ ل م

Morphology is an external annotation from the Leeds Quranic Arabic Corpus, licensed GPL-2.0-or-later. It is not Quranic text and never alters the token.

In context

Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1

How translators rendered it

Translation · 4 editions

These translations render verse 21:11 — the whole verse this word appears in — not this word alone. The correspondence is verse-level: no word-level alignment of translations exists for these editions, so we do not claim which English word renders this Arabic word. Compare the editions →

How many a guilty town have We crushed, and established thereafter another people
Translation · Talal Itani (2012)CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
How many a community that dealt unjustly have We shattered, and raised up after them another folk
Translation · Marmaduke Pickthall (1930)Public Domain
And how many a guilty city have we broken down, and raised up after it other peoples
Translation · John Medows Rodwell (1861)Public Domain
How many a city which had done wrong have we broken up, and raised up after it another people
Translation · Edward Henry Palmer (1880)Public Domain

Same form · 1 occurrence

Computed

This exact form appears only here — it is a hapax in the corpus.

Root ظ ل م · 315 occurrences

Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)

The root ظ ل م occurs 315 times across 74 distinct forms.

See the full root page for ظ ل م

Cited by 0 investigations

Community

No published investigation cites this word yet. When one does, it appears here — the evidence links back to the argument.