Skip to content
quranbench
Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1Quran 16:95:12

لَّكُمْ

Forms

Computed · derived from the Uthmani text
Uthmani (as written)
لَّكُمْ Quranic text
Simple
لَّكُمْ
Without tashkeel
لكم
Normalised (searchable)
لكم

Position

Computed
Verse
16:95
Word in verse
12
Token id
quran:tanzil-uthmani:16:95:12

Morphology

Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)
Gloss
for you
Transliteration
lakum
Root
none — this word has no triliteral root
Lemma
Part of speech
Pronoun (PRON)
Features
person: 2gender: Mnumber: plural

Sub-word segments

  1. لَّprefix · P
  2. كُمْstem · PRON

Morphology is an external annotation from the Leeds Quranic Arabic Corpus, licensed GPL-2.0-or-later. It is not Quranic text and never alters the token.

In context

Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1

How translators rendered it

Translation · 4 editions

These translations render verse 16:95 — the whole verse this word appears in — not this word alone. The correspondence is verse-level: no word-level alignment of translations exists for these editions, so we do not claim which English word renders this Arabic word. Compare the editions →

And do not exchange God’s covenant for a small price. What is with God is better for you, if you only knew
Translation · Talal Itani (2012)CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
And purchase not a small gain at the price of Allah's covenant. Lo! that which Allah hath is better for you, if ye did but know
Translation · Marmaduke Pickthall (1930)Public Domain
And barter not the covenant of God for a mean price; for with God is that which is better for you, if ye do but understand
Translation · John Medows Rodwell (1861)Public Domain
And sell not God's covenant for a little price; with God only is what is better for you, if ye did but know
Translation · Edward Henry Palmer (1880)Public Domain

Same form · 52 occurrences

Computed

This exact written form لَّكُمْ appears 52 times in the corpus.

View all 52 occurrences in search →

Cited by 0 investigations

Community

No published investigation cites this word yet. When one does, it appears here — the evidence links back to the argument.