Skip to content
quranbench
Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1Quran 9:10:7

ذِمَّةً

Forms

Computed · derived from the Uthmani text
Uthmani (as written)
ذِمَّةً Quranic text
Simple
ذِمَّةً
Without tashkeel
ذمة
Normalised (searchable)
ذمه

Position

Computed
Verse
9:10
Word in verse
7
Token id
quran:tanzil-uthmani:9:10:7

Morphology

Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)
Transliteration
dhimmatan
Lemma
ذِمَّة
Part of speech
Noun (N)
Features
case: ACCstate: indefinitegender: F

Sub-word segments

  1. ذِمَّةًstem · N · ذ م م

Morphology is an external annotation from the Leeds Quranic Arabic Corpus, licensed GPL-2.0-or-later. It is not Quranic text and never alters the token.

In context

Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1

How translators rendered it

Translation · 4 editions

These translations render verse 9:10 — the whole verse this word appears in — not this word alone. The correspondence is verse-level: no word-level alignment of translations exists for these editions, so we do not claim which English word renders this Arabic word. Compare the editions →

Towards a believer they respect neither kinship nor treaty. These are the transgressors
Translation · Talal Itani (2012)CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
And they observe toward a believer neither pact nor honour. These are they who are transgressors
Translation · Marmaduke Pickthall (1930)Public Domain
They regard not in a believer either ties of blood or faith; these are the transgressors
Translation · John Medows Rodwell (1861)Public Domain
They will not observe in a believer ties of kindred nor ties of clientship; but they it is are the transgressors
Translation · Edward Henry Palmer (1880)Public Domain

Same form · 2 occurrences

Computed

This exact written form ذِمَّةً appears 2 times in the corpus.

Root ذ م م · 5 occurrences

Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)

The root ذ م م occurs 5 times across 3 distinct forms.

See the full root page for ذ م م

Cited by 0 investigations

Community

No published investigation cites this word yet. When one does, it appears here — the evidence links back to the argument.