وَإِذَارَأَوْهُمْقَالُوٓا۟إِنَّهَٰٓؤُلَآءِلَضَآلُّونَ
Reference 83:32Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1Quran 83:32:6
لَضَآلُّونَ
Forms
Computed · derived from the Uthmani text- Uthmani (as written)
- لَضَآلُّونَ Quranic text
- Simple
- لَضَآلُّونَ
- Without tashkeel
- لضالون
- Normalised (searchable)
- لضالون
Position
Computed- Surah
- 83 · Defrauding
- Verse
- 83:32
- Word in verse
- 6
- Token id
quran:tanzil-uthmani:83:32:6
Morphology
Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)- Transliteration
- laḍāllūna
- Root
- ض ل لdd-l-l
- Lemma
- ضالّ
- Part of speech
- Noun (N)
- Features
- case: NOMgender: Mnumber: pluralderivation: ACT_PCPLverb_form: 1
Sub-word segments
- لَprefix · EMPH
- ضَآلُّونَstem · N · ض ل ل
Morphology is an external annotation from the Leeds Quranic Arabic Corpus, licensed GPL-2.0-or-later. It is not Quranic text and never alters the token.
In context
Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1Defrauding 83:32Quranic text
How translators rendered it
Translation · 4 editionsThese translations render verse 83:32 — the whole verse this word appears in — not this word alone. The correspondence is verse-level: no word-level alignment of translations exists for these editions, so we do not claim which English word renders this Arabic word. Compare the editions →
And if they saw them, they would say, “These people are lost.”And when they saw them they said: Lo! these have gone astrayAnd when they see them they say, "These are the erring onesand when they see them they say, Verily, these do go astraySame form · 2 occurrences
ComputedThis exact written form لَضَآلُّونَ appears 2 times in the corpus.
Root ض ل ل · 191 occurrences
Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)The root ض ل ل occurs 191 times across 74 distinct forms.
- ٱلضَّآلِّينَ1:7:9
- ٱلضَّلَٰلَةَ2:16:4
- يُضِلُّ2:26:29
- يُضِلُّ2:26:36
- ضَلَّ2:108:16
- ٱلضَّلَٰلَةَ2:175:4
- ٱلضَّآلِّينَ2:198:26
- تَضِلَّ2:282:67
- يُضِلُّونَكُمْ3:69:7
- يُضِلُّونَ3:69:9
- ٱلضَّآلُّونَ3:90:14
- ضَلَٰلٍ3:164:24
Cited by 0 investigations
CommunityNo published investigation cites this word yet. When one does, it appears here — the evidence links back to the argument.