The Jinn 72:5Quranic text
وَأَنَّاظَنَنَّآأَنلَّنتَقُولَٱلْإِنسُوَٱلْجِنُّعَلَىٱللَّهِكَذِبًا
Reference 72:5Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1Quran 72:5:2
ظَنَنَّآ
Forms
Computed · derived from the Uthmani text- Uthmani (as written)
- ظَنَنَّآ Quranic text
- Simple
- ظَنَنَّآ
- Without tashkeel
- ظننا
- Normalised (searchable)
- ظننا
Position
Computed- Surah
- 72 · The Jinn
- Verse
- 72:5
- Word in verse
- 2
- Token id
quran:tanzil-uthmani:72:5:2
Morphology
Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)- Gloss
- thought
- Transliteration
- ẓanannā
- Root
- ظ ن نzh-n-n
- Lemma
- ظَنَّ
- Part of speech
- Verb (V)
- Features
- tense: PERFperson: 1number: pluralverb_form: 1
Sub-word segments
- ظَنَstem · V · ظ ن ن
- نَّآsuffix · PRON
Morphology is an external annotation from the Leeds Quranic Arabic Corpus, licensed GPL-2.0-or-later. It is not Quranic text and never alters the token.
In context
Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1How translators rendered it
Translation · 4 editionsThese translations render verse 72:5 — the whole verse this word appears in — not this word alone. The correspondence is verse-level: no word-level alignment of translations exists for these editions, so we do not claim which English word renders this Arabic word. Compare the editions →
And we thought that humans and jinn would never utter lies about GodAnd lo! we had supposed that humankind and jinn would not speak a lie concerning AllahAnd we verily thought that no one amongst men or Djinn would have uttered a lie against GodAnd we thought that men and ginn would never speak a lie against GodSame form · 2 occurrences
ComputedThis exact written form ظَنَنَّآ appears 2 times in the corpus.
Root ظ ن ن · 69 occurrences
Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)The root ظ ن ن occurs 69 times across 33 distinct forms.
- يَظُنُّونَ2:46:2
- يَظُنُّونَ2:78:11
- ظَنَّآ2:230:20
- يَظُنُّونَ2:249:45
- يَظُنُّونَ3:154:16
- ظَنَّ3:154:20
- ٱلظَّنِّ4:157:31
- ٱلظَّنَّ6:116:14
- ٱلظَّنَّ6:148:33
- لَنَظُنُّكَ7:66:12
- وَظَنُّوٓا۟7:171:7
- وَظَنُّوٓا۟9:118:15
Cited by 0 investigations
CommunityNo published investigation cites this word yet. When one does, it appears here — the evidence links back to the argument.