أَفَمِنْهَٰذَاٱلْحَدِيثِتَعْجَبُونَ
Reference 53:59هَٰذَا
Forms
Computed · derived from the Uthmani text- Uthmani (as written)
- هَٰذَا Quranic text
- Simple
- هَٰذَا
- Without tashkeel
- هذا
- Normalised (searchable)
- هذا
Position
Computed- Surah
- 53 · The Star
- Verse
- 53:59
- Word in verse
- 2
- Token id
quran:tanzil-uthmani:53:59:2
Morphology
Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)- Gloss
- this
- Transliteration
- hādhā
- Root
- none — this word has no triliteral root
- Lemma
- ذا
- Part of speech
- Demonstrative (DEM)
- Features
- gender: Mnumber: singular
Sub-word segments
- هَٰprefix · ATT
- ذَاstem · DEM
Morphology is an external annotation from the Leeds Quranic Arabic Corpus, licensed GPL-2.0-or-later. It is not Quranic text and never alters the token.
In context
Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1How translators rendered it
Translation · 5 editionsThese translations render verse 53:59 — the whole verse this word appears in — not this word alone. The correspondence is verse-level: no word-level alignment of translations exists for these editions, so we do not claim which English word renders this Arabic word. Compare the editions →
Do you marvel at this discourseMarvel ye then at this statementIs it at these sayings that ye marvelAt this new discourse then do ye wonderis it from this the account you wonderGenerated from a table of word-by-word decisions, not written as prose. Arabic word order is preserved, so it reads stiffly and is not a substitute for a translation written by a person. Every verse is rendered, but the whole remains under review: words marked as judgement rest on weaker evidence than the rest and are flagged in place. No tafsir, hadith or existing translation was consulted.
Same form · 156 occurrences
ComputedThis exact written form هَٰذَا appears 156 times in the corpus.
- هَٰذَا2:25:20
- هَٰذَا2:79:8
- هَٰذَا2:126:6
- هَٰذَا3:37:22
- هَٰذَا3:51:6
- هَٰذَا3:62:2
- هَٰذَا3:125:8
- هَٰذَا3:138:1
- هَٰذَا3:165:9
- هَٰذَا3:191:16
- هَٰذَا5:31:18
- هَٰذَا5:41:35
Cited by 0 investigations
CommunityNo published investigation cites this word yet. When one does, it appears here — the evidence links back to the argument.