وَقَوْمَنُوحٍمِّنقَبْلُإِنَّهُمْكَانُوا۟قَوْمًافَٰسِقِينَ
Reference 51:46Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1Quran 51:46:1
وَقَوْمَ
Forms
Computed · derived from the Uthmani text- Uthmani (as written)
- وَقَوْمَ Quranic text
- Simple
- وَقَوْمَ
- Without tashkeel
- وقوم
- Normalised (searchable)
- وقوم
Position
Computed- Verse
- 51:46
- Word in verse
- 1
- Token id
quran:tanzil-uthmani:51:46:1
Morphology
Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)- Gloss
- And (the) people
- Transliteration
- waqawma
- Root
- ق و مq-w-m
- Lemma
- قَوْم
- Part of speech
- Noun (N)
- Features
- case: ACCgender: M
Sub-word segments
- وَprefix · CONJ
- قَوْمَstem · N · ق و م
Morphology is an external annotation from the Leeds Quranic Arabic Corpus, licensed GPL-2.0-or-later. It is not Quranic text and never alters the token.
In context
Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1The Winnowing Winds 51:46Quranic text
How translators rendered it
Translation · 4 editionsThese translations render verse 51:46 — the whole verse this word appears in — not this word alone. The correspondence is verse-level: no word-level alignment of translations exists for these editions, so we do not claim which English word renders this Arabic word. Compare the editions →
And before that, the people of Noah. They were immoral peopleAnd the folk of Noah aforetime. Lo! they were licentious folkAnd we destroyed the people of Noah, before them; for an impious people were theyAnd the people of Noah of yore; verily, they were an abominable peopleSame form · 3 occurrences
ComputedThis exact written form وَقَوْمَ appears 3 times in the corpus.
Root ق و م · 660 occurrences
Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)The root ق و م occurs 660 times across 155 distinct forms.
- ٱلْمُسْتَقِيمَ1:6:3
- وَيُقِيمُونَ2:3:4
- قَامُوا۟2:20:13
- وَأَقِيمُوا۟2:43:1
- لِقَوْمِهِۦ2:54:4
- يَٰقَوْمِ2:54:5
- لِقَوْمِهِۦ2:60:4
- لِقَوْمِهِۦٓ2:67:4
- وَأَقِيمُوا۟2:83:19
- ٱلْقِيَٰمَةِ2:85:40
- وَأَقِيمُوا۟2:110:1
- ٱلْقِيَٰمَةِ2:113:27
Cited by 0 investigations
CommunityNo published investigation cites this word yet. When one does, it appears here — the evidence links back to the argument.