The Table 5:50Quranic text
أَفَحُكْمَٱلْجَٰهِلِيَّةِيَبْغُونَوَمَنْأَحْسَنُمِنَٱللَّهِحُكْمًالِّقَوْمٍيُوقِنُونَ
Reference 5:50Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1Quran 5:50:6
مِنَ
Forms
Computed · derived from the Uthmani text- Uthmani (as written)
- مِنَ Quranic text
- Simple
- مِنَ
- Without tashkeel
- من
- Normalised (searchable)
- من
Position
Computed- Surah
- 5 · The Table
- Verse
- 5:50
- Word in verse
- 6
- Token id
quran:tanzil-uthmani:5:50:6
Morphology
Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)- Gloss
- than
- Transliteration
- mina
- Root
- none — this word has no triliteral root
- Lemma
- مِن
- Part of speech
- Preposition (P)
- Features
- —
Sub-word segments
- مِنَstem · P
Morphology is an external annotation from the Leeds Quranic Arabic Corpus, licensed GPL-2.0-or-later. It is not Quranic text and never alters the token.
In context
Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1How translators rendered it
Translation · 4 editionsThese translations render verse 5:50 — the whole verse this word appears in — not this word alone. The correspondence is verse-level: no word-level alignment of translations exists for these editions, so we do not claim which English word renders this Arabic word. Compare the editions →
Is it the laws of the time of ignorance that they desire? Who is better than God in judgment for people who are certainIs it a judgment of the time of (pagan) ignorance that they are seeking? Who is better than Allah for judgment to a people who have certainty (in their belief)Desire they, therefore, the judgments of the times of(pagan) ignorance? But what better judge can there be than God for those who believe firmlyIs it the judgment of the Ignorance they crave? but who is better than God to judge for people who are sureSame form · 412 occurrences
ComputedThis exact written form مِنَ appears 412 times in the corpus.
- مِنَ2:22:9
- مِنَ2:22:14
- مِنَ2:34:12
- مِنَ2:35:17
- مِنَ2:67:19
- مِنَ2:74:13
- مِنَ2:96:18
- مِنَ2:120:22
- مِنَ2:120:26
- مِنَ2:126:11
- مِنَ2:127:5
- مِنَ2:135:14
Cited by 0 investigations
CommunityNo published investigation cites this word yet. When one does, it appears here — the evidence links back to the argument.