Skip to content
quranbench
Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1Quran 44:37:4

قَوْمُ

Forms

Computed · derived from the Uthmani text
Uthmani (as written)
قَوْمُ Quranic text
Simple
قَوْمُ
Without tashkeel
قوم
Normalised (searchable)
قوم

Position

Computed
Verse
44:37
Word in verse
4
Token id
quran:tanzil-uthmani:44:37:4

Morphology

Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)
Transliteration
qawmu
Lemma
قَوْم
Part of speech
Noun (N)
Features
case: NOMgender: M

Sub-word segments

  1. قَوْمُstem · N · ق و م

Morphology is an external annotation from the Leeds Quranic Arabic Corpus, licensed GPL-2.0-or-later. It is not Quranic text and never alters the token.

In context

Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1

How translators rendered it

Translation · 4 editions

These translations render verse 44:37 — the whole verse this word appears in — not this word alone. The correspondence is verse-level: no word-level alignment of translations exists for these editions, so we do not claim which English word renders this Arabic word. Compare the editions →

Are they better, or the people of Tubba and those before them? We annihilated them. They were evildoers
Translation · Talal Itani (2012)CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Are they better, or the folk of Tubb'a and those before them? We destroyed them, for surely they were guilty
Translation · Marmaduke Pickthall (1930)Public Domain
Are they better than the people of Tobba, And those who flourished before them whom we destroyed for their evil deeds
Translation · John Medows Rodwell (1861)Public Domain
Are they better than the people of Tubbah, and those before them? We destroyed them - verily, they were sinners
Translation · Edward Henry Palmer (1880)Public Domain

Same form · 11 occurrences

Computed

This exact written form قَوْمُ appears 11 times in the corpus.

Root ق و م · 660 occurrences

Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)

The root ق و م occurs 660 times across 155 distinct forms.

See the full root page for ق و م

Cited by 0 investigations

Community

No published investigation cites this word yet. When one does, it appears here — the evidence links back to the argument.