وَمَايَنظُرُهَٰٓؤُلَآءِإِلَّاصَيْحَةًوَٰحِدَةًمَّالَهَامِنفَوَاقٍ
Reference 38:15Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1Quran 38:15:10
فَوَاقٍ
Forms
Computed · derived from the Uthmani text- Uthmani (as written)
- فَوَاقٍ Quranic text
- Simple
- فَوَاقٍ
- Without tashkeel
- فواق
- Normalised (searchable)
- فواق
Position
Computed- Surah
- 38 · The letter Saad
- Verse
- 38:15
- Word in verse
- 10
- Token id
quran:tanzil-uthmani:38:15:10
Morphology
Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)- Gloss
- delay.
- Transliteration
- fawāqin
- Root
- ف و قf-w-q
- Lemma
- فَواق
- Part of speech
- Noun (N)
- Features
- case: GENstate: indefinitegender: M
Sub-word segments
- فَوَاقٍstem · N · ف و ق
Morphology is an external annotation from the Leeds Quranic Arabic Corpus, licensed GPL-2.0-or-later. It is not Quranic text and never alters the token.
In context
Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1The letter Saad 38:15Quranic text
How translators rendered it
Translation · 4 editionsThese translations render verse 38:15 — the whole verse this word appears in — not this word alone. The correspondence is verse-level: no word-level alignment of translations exists for these editions, so we do not claim which English word renders this Arabic word. Compare the editions →
These can expect only a single scream, from which there is no recoveryThese wait for but one Shout, there will be no second theretoAnd these (Meccans) await but one single trumpet blast - There shall be no delaying itDo these await aught else but one noise for which there shall be no pauseSame form · 1 occurrence
ComputedThis exact form appears only here — it is a hapax in the corpus.
Root ف و ق · 43 occurrences
Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)The root ف و ق occurs 43 times across 15 distinct forms.
- فَوْقَهَا2:26:11
- فَوْقَكُمُ2:63:5
- فَوْقَكُمُ2:93:5
- فَوْقَهُمْ2:212:12
- فَوْقَ3:55:16
- فَوْقَ4:11:12
- فَوْقَهُمُ4:154:2
- فَوْقِهِمْ5:66:13
- فَوْقَ6:18:3
- فَوْقَ6:61:3
- فَوْقِكُمْ6:65:10
- فَوْقَ6:165:8
Cited by 0 investigations
CommunityNo published investigation cites this word yet. When one does, it appears here — the evidence links back to the argument.