Skip to content
quranbench
Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1Quran 32:10:11

هُم

Forms

Computed · derived from the Uthmani text
Uthmani (as written)
هُم Quranic text
Simple
هُم
Without tashkeel
هم
Normalised (searchable)
هم

Position

Computed
Verse
32:10
Word in verse
11
Token id
quran:tanzil-uthmani:32:10:11

Morphology

Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)
Gloss
they
Transliteration
hum
Root
none — this word has no triliteral root
Lemma
Part of speech
Pronoun (PRON)
Features
person: 3gender: Mnumber: plural

Sub-word segments

  1. هُمstem · PRON

Morphology is an external annotation from the Leeds Quranic Arabic Corpus, licensed GPL-2.0-or-later. It is not Quranic text and never alters the token.

In context

Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1

How translators rendered it

Translation · 4 editions

These translations render verse 32:10 — the whole verse this word appears in — not this word alone. The correspondence is verse-level: no word-level alignment of translations exists for these editions, so we do not claim which English word renders this Arabic word. Compare the editions →

And they say, “When we are lost into the earth, shall we be in a new creation?” In fact, they deny the meeting with their Lord
Translation · Talal Itani (2012)CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
And they say: When we are lost in the earth, how can we then be re-created? Nay but they are disbelievers in the meeting with their Lord
Translation · Marmaduke Pickthall (1930)Public Domain
And they say, "What! when we shall have lain hidden in the earth, shall we become a new creation?" Yea, they deny that they shall meet their Lord
Translation · John Medows Rodwell (1861)Public Domain
And they say, 'When we are lost in the earth, shall we then become a new creation?' Nay! in the meeting of their Lord they disbelieve
Translation · Edward Henry Palmer (1880)Public Domain

Same form · 36 occurrences

Computed

This exact written form هُم appears 36 times in the corpus.

View all 36 occurrences in search →

Cited by 0 investigations

Community

No published investigation cites this word yet. When one does, it appears here — the evidence links back to the argument.