Skip to content
quranbench
Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1Quran 3:169:8

أَمْوَٰتًۢا

Forms

Computed · derived from the Uthmani text
Uthmani (as written)
أَمْوَٰتًۢا Quranic text
Simple
أَمْوَٰتًا
Without tashkeel
أموتا
Normalised (searchable)
اموتا

Position

Computed
Verse
3:169
Word in verse
8
Token id
quran:tanzil-uthmani:3:169:8

Morphology

Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)
Transliteration
amwātan
Lemma
مَيِّت
Part of speech
Noun (N)
Features
case: ACCstate: indefinitegender: Mnumber: plural

Sub-word segments

  1. أَمْوَٰتًۢاstem · N · م و ت

Morphology is an external annotation from the Leeds Quranic Arabic Corpus, licensed GPL-2.0-or-later. It is not Quranic text and never alters the token.

In context

Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1

How translators rendered it

Translation · 4 editions

These translations render verse 3:169 — the whole verse this word appears in — not this word alone. The correspondence is verse-level: no word-level alignment of translations exists for these editions, so we do not claim which English word renders this Arabic word. Compare the editions →

Do not consider those killed in the cause of God as dead. In fact, they are alive, at their Lord, well provided for
Translation · Talal Itani (2012)CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Think not of those, who are slain in the way of Allah, as dead. Nay, they are living. With their Lord they have provision
Translation · Marmaduke Pickthall (1930)Public Domain
And repute not those slain on God's path to be dead. Nay, alive with their Lord, are they richly sustained
Translation · John Medows Rodwell (1861)Public Domain
Count not those who are killed in the way of God as dead, but living with their Lord;- provided for
Translation · Edward Henry Palmer (1880)Public Domain

Same form · 1 occurrence

Computed

This exact form appears only here — it is a hapax in the corpus.

Root م و ت · 165 occurrences

Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)

The root م و ت occurs 165 times across 68 distinct forms.

See the full root page for م و ت

Cited by 0 investigations

Community

No published investigation cites this word yet. When one does, it appears here — the evidence links back to the argument.