Skip to content
quranbench
Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1Quran 27:55:11

تَجْهَلُونَ

Forms

Computed · derived from the Uthmani text
Uthmani (as written)
تَجْهَلُونَ Quranic text
Simple
تَجْهَلُونَ
Without tashkeel
تجهلون
Normalised (searchable)
تجهلون

Position

Computed
Verse
27:55
Word in verse
11
Token id
quran:tanzil-uthmani:27:55:11

Morphology

Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)
Transliteration
tajhalūna
Lemma
يَجْهَلُ
Part of speech
Verb (V)
Features
tense: IMPFmood: INDperson: 2gender: Mnumber: pluralverb_form: 1

Sub-word segments

  1. تَجْهَلُstem · V · ج ه ل
  2. ونَsuffix · PRON

Morphology is an external annotation from the Leeds Quranic Arabic Corpus, licensed GPL-2.0-or-later. It is not Quranic text and never alters the token.

In context

Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1

How translators rendered it

Translation · 4 editions

These translations render verse 27:55 — the whole verse this word appears in — not this word alone. The correspondence is verse-level: no word-level alignment of translations exists for these editions, so we do not claim which English word renders this Arabic word. Compare the editions →

Do you lust after men instead of women? You are truly ignorant people.”
Translation · Talal Itani (2012)CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Must ye needs lust after men instead of women? Nay, but ye are folk who act senselessly
Translation · Marmaduke Pickthall (1930)Public Domain
What! come ye with lust unto men rather than to women? Surely ye are an ignorant people
Translation · John Medows Rodwell (1861)Public Domain
do ye indeed approach men lustfully rather than women? nay! ye are a people who are ignorant
Translation · Edward Henry Palmer (1880)Public Domain

Same form · 4 occurrences

Computed

This exact written form تَجْهَلُونَ appears 4 times in the corpus.

Root ج ه ل · 24 occurrences

Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)

The root ج ه ل occurs 24 times across 9 distinct forms.

See the full root page for ج ه ل

Cited by 0 investigations

Community

No published investigation cites this word yet. When one does, it appears here — the evidence links back to the argument.