فَإِنْعَصَوْكَفَقُلْإِنِّىبَرِىٓءٌمِّمَّاتَعْمَلُونَ
Reference 26:216Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1Quran 26:216:2
عَصَوْكَ
Forms
Computed · derived from the Uthmani text- Uthmani (as written)
- عَصَوْكَ Quranic text
- Simple
- عَصَوْكَ
- Without tashkeel
- عصوك
- Normalised (searchable)
- عصوك
Position
Computed- Surah
- 26 · The Poets
- Verse
- 26:216
- Word in verse
- 2
- Token id
quran:tanzil-uthmani:26:216:2
Morphology
Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)- Gloss
- they disobey you
- Transliteration
- ʿaṣawka
- Root
- ع ص يaa-sd-y
- Lemma
- عَصا
- Part of speech
- Verb (V)
- Features
- tense: PERFperson: 3gender: Mnumber: pluralverb_form: 1
Sub-word segments
- عَصَstem · V · ع ص ي
- وْsuffix · PRON
- كَsuffix · PRON
Morphology is an external annotation from the Leeds Quranic Arabic Corpus, licensed GPL-2.0-or-later. It is not Quranic text and never alters the token.
In context
Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1The Poets 26:216Quranic text
How translators rendered it
Translation · 4 editionsThese translations render verse 26:216 — the whole verse this word appears in — not this word alone. The correspondence is verse-level: no word-level alignment of translations exists for these editions, so we do not claim which English word renders this Arabic word. Compare the editions →
And if they disobey you, say, “I am innocent of what you do.”And if they (thy kinsfolk) disobey thee, say: Lo! I am innocent of what they doAnd if they disobey thee, then say: "I will not be answerable for your doingsbut if they rebel against thee, say, 'Verily, I am clear of what ye doSame form · 1 occurrence
ComputedThis exact form appears only here — it is a hapax in the corpus.
Root ع ص ي · 32 occurrences
Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)The root ع ص ي occurs 32 times across 23 distinct forms.
- عَصَوا۟2:61:57
- وَعَصَيْنَا2:93:14
- عَصَوا۟3:112:33
- وَعَصَيْتُم3:152:14
- يَعْصِ4:14:2
- وَعَصَوُا۟4:42:5
- وَعَصَيْنَا4:46:10
- عَصَوا۟5:78:15
- عَصَيْتُ6:15:5
- عَصَيْتُ10:15:35
- عَصَيْتَ10:91:3
- وَعَصَوْا۟11:59:6
Cited by 0 investigations
CommunityNo published investigation cites this word yet. When one does, it appears here — the evidence links back to the argument.