Skip to content
quranbench
Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1Quran 26:183:2

تَبْخَسُوا۟

Forms

Computed · derived from the Uthmani text
Uthmani (as written)
تَبْخَسُوا۟ Quranic text
Simple
تَبْخَسُوا
Without tashkeel
تبخسوا
Normalised (searchable)
تبخسوا

Position

Computed
Verse
26:183
Word in verse
2
Token id
quran:tanzil-uthmani:26:183:2

Morphology

Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)
Gloss
deprive
Transliteration
tabkhasū
Lemma
يَبْخَسْ
Part of speech
Verb (V)
Features
tense: IMPFmood: JUSperson: 2gender: Mnumber: pluralverb_form: 1

Sub-word segments

  1. تَبْخَسُstem · V · ب خ س
  2. وا۟suffix · PRON

Morphology is an external annotation from the Leeds Quranic Arabic Corpus, licensed GPL-2.0-or-later. It is not Quranic text and never alters the token.

In context

Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1

How translators rendered it

Translation · 4 editions

These translations render verse 26:183 — the whole verse this word appears in — not this word alone. The correspondence is verse-level: no word-level alignment of translations exists for these editions, so we do not claim which English word renders this Arabic word. Compare the editions →

And do not defraud people of their belongings, and do not work corruption in the land
Translation · Talal Itani (2012)CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Wrong not mankind in their goods, and do not evil, making mischief, in the earth
Translation · Marmaduke Pickthall (1930)Public Domain
And defraud not men in their substance, and do no wrong on the earth by deeds of licence
Translation · John Medows Rodwell (1861)Public Domain
and do not cheat men of their goods; and waste not the land, despoiling it
Translation · Edward Henry Palmer (1880)Public Domain

Same form · 3 occurrences

Computed

This exact written form تَبْخَسُوا۟ appears 3 times in the corpus.

Root ب خ س · 7 occurrences

Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)

The root ب خ س occurs 7 times across 5 distinct forms.

See the full root page for ب خ س

Cited by 0 investigations

Community

No published investigation cites this word yet. When one does, it appears here — the evidence links back to the argument.