قَالَفَمَاخَطْبُكَيَٰسَٰمِرِىُّ
Reference 20:95فَمَا
Forms
Computed · derived from the Uthmani text- Uthmani (as written)
- فَمَا Quranic text
- Simple
- فَمَا
- Without tashkeel
- فما
- Normalised (searchable)
- فما
Position
Computed- Surah
- 20 · Taa-Haa
- Verse
- 20:95
- Word in verse
- 2
- Token id
quran:tanzil-uthmani:20:95:2
Morphology
Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)- Gloss
- "Then what
- Transliteration
- famā
- Root
- none — this word has no triliteral root
- Lemma
- ما
- Part of speech
- Relative pronoun (REL)
- Features
- —
Sub-word segments
- فَprefix · REM
- مَاstem · REL
Morphology is an external annotation from the Leeds Quranic Arabic Corpus, licensed GPL-2.0-or-later. It is not Quranic text and never alters the token.
In context
Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1How translators rendered it
Translation · 5 editionsThese translations render verse 20:95 — the whole verse this word appears in — not this word alone. The correspondence is verse-level: no word-level alignment of translations exists for these editions, so we do not claim which English word renders this Arabic word. Compare the editions →
He said, “What do you have to say, O Samarian?”(Moses) said: And what hast thou to say, O SamiriHe said, "And what was thy motive, O SamiriSaid he, 'What was thy design, O Samariyhe said so what your the matter SamiriGenerated from a table of word-by-word decisions, not written as prose. Arabic word order is preserved, so it reads stiffly and is not a substitute for a translation written by a person. Every verse is rendered, but the whole remains under review: words marked as judgement rest on weaker evidence than the rest and are flagged in place. No tafsir, hadith or existing translation was consulted.
Same form · 71 occurrences
ComputedThis exact written form فَمَا appears 71 times in the corpus.
- فَمَا2:16:6
- فَمَا2:26:10
- فَمَا2:85:28
- فَمَا2:196:7
- فَمَا2:196:41
- فَمَا3:146:8
- فَمَا4:24:22
- فَمَا4:88:1
- فَمَا4:90:31
- فَمَا5:67:12
- فَمَا6:136:15
- فَمَا7:5:1
Cited by 0 investigations
CommunityNo published investigation cites this word yet. When one does, it appears here — the evidence links back to the argument.