Skip to content
quranbench
Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1Quran 19:54:10

رَسُولًا

Forms

Computed · derived from the Uthmani text
Uthmani (as written)
رَسُولًا Quranic text
Simple
رَسُولًا
Without tashkeel
رسولا
Normalised (searchable)
رسولا

Position

Computed
Verse
19:54
Word in verse
10
Token id
quran:tanzil-uthmani:19:54:10

Morphology

Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)
Transliteration
rasūlan
Lemma
رَسُول
Part of speech
Noun (N)
Features
case: ACCstate: indefinitegender: M

Sub-word segments

  1. رَسُولًاstem · N · ر س ل

Morphology is an external annotation from the Leeds Quranic Arabic Corpus, licensed GPL-2.0-or-later. It is not Quranic text and never alters the token.

In context

Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1

How translators rendered it

Translation · 4 editions

These translations render verse 19:54 — the whole verse this word appears in — not this word alone. The correspondence is verse-level: no word-level alignment of translations exists for these editions, so we do not claim which English word renders this Arabic word. Compare the editions →

And mention in the Scripture Ishmael. He was true to his promise, and was a messenger, a prophet
Translation · Talal Itani (2012)CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
And make mention in the Scripture of Ishmael. Lo! he was a keeper of his promise, and he was a messenger (of Allah), a prophet
Translation · Marmaduke Pickthall (1930)Public Domain
And commemorate Ismael in "the Book;" for he was true to his promise, and was an Apostle, a Prophet
Translation · John Medows Rodwell (1861)Public Domain
And mention, in the Book, Ishmael; verily, he was true to his promise, and was an apostle,- a prophet
Translation · Edward Henry Palmer (1880)Public Domain

Same form · 17 occurrences

Computed

This exact written form رَسُولًا appears 17 times in the corpus.

View all 17 occurrences in search →

Root ر س ل · 513 occurrences

Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)

The root ر س ل occurs 513 times across 142 distinct forms.

See the full root page for ر س ل

Cited by 0 investigations

Community

No published investigation cites this word yet. When one does, it appears here — the evidence links back to the argument.