Skip to content
quranbench
Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1Quran 18:12:9

أَمَدًا

Forms

Computed · derived from the Uthmani text
Uthmani (as written)
أَمَدًا Quranic text
Simple
أَمَدًا
Without tashkeel
أمدا
Normalised (searchable)
امدا

Position

Computed
Verse
18:12
Word in verse
9
Token id
quran:tanzil-uthmani:18:12:9

Morphology

Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)
Transliteration
amadan
Lemma
أَمَد
Part of speech
Noun (N)
Features
case: ACCstate: indefinitegender: M

Sub-word segments

  1. أَمَدًاstem · N · أ م د

Morphology is an external annotation from the Leeds Quranic Arabic Corpus, licensed GPL-2.0-or-later. It is not Quranic text and never alters the token.

In context

Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1

How translators rendered it

Translation · 4 editions

These translations render verse 18:12 — the whole verse this word appears in — not this word alone. The correspondence is verse-level: no word-level alignment of translations exists for these editions, so we do not claim which English word renders this Arabic word. Compare the editions →

Then We awakened them to know which of the two groups could better calculate the length of their stay
Translation · Talal Itani (2012)CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
And afterward We raised them up that We might know which of the two parties would best calculate the time that they had tarried
Translation · Marmaduke Pickthall (1930)Public Domain
Then we awaked them that we might know which of the two parties could best reckon the space of their abiding
Translation · John Medows Rodwell (1861)Public Domain
Then we raised them up again, that we might know which of the two crews could best calculate the time of their tarrying
Translation · Edward Henry Palmer (1880)Public Domain

Same form · 2 occurrences

Computed

This exact written form أَمَدًا appears 2 times in the corpus.

Root أ م د · 4 occurrences

Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)

The root أ م د occurs 4 times across 3 distinct forms.

See the full root page for أ م د

Cited by 0 investigations

Community

No published investigation cites this word yet. When one does, it appears here — the evidence links back to the argument.