Skip to content
quranbench
Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1Quran 14:26:6

ٱجْتُثَّتْ

Forms

Computed · derived from the Uthmani text
Uthmani (as written)
ٱجْتُثَّتْ Quranic text
Simple
اجْتُثَّتْ
Without tashkeel
ٱجتثت
Normalised (searchable)
اجتثت

Position

Computed
Verse
14:26
Word in verse
6
Token id
quran:tanzil-uthmani:14:26:6

Morphology

Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)
Transliteration
uj'tuthat
Lemma
اجْتُثَّتْ
Part of speech
Verb (V)
Features
tense: PERFvoice: passiveperson: 3gender: Fnumber: singularverb_form: 8

Sub-word segments

  1. ٱجْتُثَّتْstem · V · ج ث ث

Morphology is an external annotation from the Leeds Quranic Arabic Corpus, licensed GPL-2.0-or-later. It is not Quranic text and never alters the token.

In context

Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1

How translators rendered it

Translation · 4 editions

These translations render verse 14:26 — the whole verse this word appears in — not this word alone. The correspondence is verse-level: no word-level alignment of translations exists for these editions, so we do not claim which English word renders this Arabic word. Compare the editions →

And the parable of a bad word is that of a bad tree—it is uprooted from the ground; it has no stability
Translation · Talal Itani (2012)CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
And the similitude of a bad saying is as a bad tree, uprooted from upon the earth, possessing no stability
Translation · Marmaduke Pickthall (1930)Public Domain
And an evil word is like an evil tree torn up from the face of the earth, and without strength to stand
Translation · John Medows Rodwell (1861)Public Domain
And the likeness of a bad word is as a bad tree, which is felled from above the earth, and has no staying place
Translation · Edward Henry Palmer (1880)Public Domain

Same form · 1 occurrence

Computed

This exact form appears only here — it is a hapax in the corpus.

Root ج ث ث · 1 occurrence

Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)

The root ج ث ث occurs 1 time across 1 distinct form.

See the full root page for ج ث ث

Cited by 0 investigations

Community

No published investigation cites this word yet. When one does, it appears here — the evidence links back to the argument.