Skip to content
quranbench
Search
Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1Quran 11:68:11

بُعْدًا

Forms

Computed · derived from the Uthmani text
Uthmani (as written)
بُعْدًا Quranic text
Simple
بُعْدًا
Without tashkeel
بعدا
Normalised (searchable)
بعدا

Position

Computed
Surah
11 · Hud
Verse
11:68
Word in verse
11
Token id
quran:tanzil-uthmani:11:68:11

Morphology

Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)
Gloss
away
Transliteration
buʿ'dan
Root
ب ع دb-aa-d
Lemma
بُعْد
Part of speech
Noun (N)
Features
case: ACCstate: indefinitegender: M

Sub-word segments

  1. بُعْدًاstem · N · ب ع د

Morphology is an external annotation from the Leeds Quranic Arabic Corpus, licensed GPL-2.0-or-later. It is not Quranic text and never alters the token.

In context

Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1

How translators rendered it

Translation · 4 editions

These translations render verse 11:68 — the whole verse this word appears in — not this word alone. The correspondence is verse-level: no word-level alignment of translations exists for these editions, so we do not claim which English word renders this Arabic word. Compare the editions →

As if they had never prospered therein. Indeed, Thamood rejected their Lord, so away with Thamood
Translation · Talal Itani (2012)CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
As though they had not dwelt there. Lo! Thamud disbelieved in their Lord. A far removal for Thamud
Translation · Marmaduke Pickthall (1930)Public Domain
As though they had never abode in them. What! Did not Themoud disbelieve his Lord? Was not Themoud utterly cast off
Translation · John Medows Rodwell (1861)Public Domain
as though they had never dwelt therein. Did not Thamud indeed disbelieve in their Lord? Aye! away with Thamud
Translation · Edward Henry Palmer (1880)Public Domain

Same form · 4 occurrences

Computed

This exact written form بُعْدًا appears 4 times in the corpus.

Root ب ع د · 235 occurrences

Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)

The root ب ع د occurs 235 times across 28 distinct forms.

See the full root page for ب ع د →

Cited by 0 investigations

Community

No published investigation cites this word yet. When one does, it appears here — the evidence links back to the argument.