Skip to content
quranbench
Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1Quran 11:118:2

شَآءَ

Forms

Computed · derived from the Uthmani text
Uthmani (as written)
شَآءَ Quranic text
Simple
شَآءَ
Without tashkeel
شاء
Normalised (searchable)
شاء

Position

Computed
Verse
11:118
Word in verse
2
Token id
quran:tanzil-uthmani:11:118:2

Morphology

Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)
Transliteration
shāa
Lemma
شاءَ
Part of speech
Verb (V)
Features
tense: PERFperson: 3gender: Mnumber: singularverb_form: 1

Sub-word segments

  1. شَآءَstem · V · ش ي أ

Morphology is an external annotation from the Leeds Quranic Arabic Corpus, licensed GPL-2.0-or-later. It is not Quranic text and never alters the token.

In context

Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1

How translators rendered it

Translation · 4 editions

These translations render verse 11:118 — the whole verse this word appears in — not this word alone. The correspondence is verse-level: no word-level alignment of translations exists for these editions, so we do not claim which English word renders this Arabic word. Compare the editions →

Had your Lord willed, He could have made humanity one community, but they continue to differ
Translation · Talal Itani (2012)CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
And if thy Lord had willed, He verily would have made mankind one nation, yet they cease not differing
Translation · Marmaduke Pickthall (1930)Public Domain
Had thy Lord pleased he would have made mankind of one religion: but those only to whom thy Lord hath granted his mercy will cease to differ
Translation · John Medows Rodwell (1861)Public Domain
Had thy Lord pleased, He would have made men one nation; but they will not cease to differ
Translation · Edward Henry Palmer (1880)Public Domain

Same form · 56 occurrences

Computed

This exact written form شَآءَ appears 56 times in the corpus.

View all 56 occurrences in search →

Root ش ي أ · 519 occurrences

Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)

The root ش ي أ occurs 519 times across 29 distinct forms.

See the full root page for ش ي أ

Cited by 0 investigations

Community

No published investigation cites this word yet. When one does, it appears here — the evidence links back to the argument.