Skip to content
quranbench
Morphology · Leeds QAC (GPL)Root · q · m · tt · r

ق م ط ر

Overview

Computed
Occurrences
1
Distinct forms
1

Meaning

Morphology · Lane's Lexicon · CC BY-SA 3.0

From Edward William Lane, An Arabic-English Lexicon (1863–1893), under the root قمطر. Digitised by the Perseus Project (Tufts); Arabic decoded from Perseus's transliteration.

اـِقْمَطَرَّ It (a day, S) was, or became, distressful, or calamitous. (S, K.)

Show the full entry (6 passages)

قَمْطَرٌ : see قَمْطَرِيرٌ .

قِمَطْرٌ and قِمَطْرَةٌ (S, Msb, K) and with tesh-deed, [i. e. قِمَّطْرٌ and قِمَّطْرَةٌ ,] but this pronunciation is extr., (K,) or, accord. to Yaakoob, (S,) or ISk, (TA,) not allowable, (S, TA,) A repository for books or writings, (S, Msb, K, TA,) resembling a سَفَط , [q. v., (in the TA, سقط , which is evidently a mistake,)] made of reeds woven together: (TA:) the first word is fem., like the second, as well as masc.: (Msb:) pl. قَمَاطِرُ . (S, Msb.)

يَوْمٌ قَمْطَرِيرٌ , and ↓ قُمَاطِرٌ , (S, K,) and ↓ مُقْمَطِرٌّ , (TA,) A distressful, or calamitous, day: (S, K:) or a day that makes one knit the brow, or contract the skin between the eyes: so the first is explained by some as occurring in the Kur lxxvi. 10. (TA.) ― -b2- شَرٌّ قَمْطَرِيرٌ , (TA,) and ↓ قُمَاطِرٌ , and ↓ قَمْطَرٌ , (Lth, TA,) and ↓ مُقْمَطِرٌّ , (TA,) Intense evil. (Lth, TA.)

قُمَاطِرٌ : see قَمْطَرِيرٌ , in two places.

مُقْمَطِرٌّ : see قَمْطَرِيرٌ , in two places.

Derived forms · 1

Morphology · Leeds QAC

Distribution across surahs

Computed

Lemmas

Morphology · Leeds QAC

Connected roots

Computed · co-occurrence · window: the verse

The roots that most often share a verse with ق م ط ر. Window: the verse. Measure: the number of distinct verses in which both roots occur (of the 1 this root appears in). Ubiquitous roots are excluded so genuinely connected concepts surface — see the method.

Occurrences · 1 verse

Quranic text · Tanzil Uthmani 1.1

Page 1 of 1. The root is highlighted in each verse.

Cited by 0 investigations

Community

No published investigation cites this root yet. When one does, it appears here — the evidence links back to the argument.